"But she's a vice president," a company marketing manager gasps. "So I just assumed she was senior enough to handle this. You mean she's just a few years out of college, and probably hasn't faced this sort of issue before?"Yup, yes, you got it, and double-yes. That's exactly the case. Welcome to PR agency title inflation.
Sure, exaggerated titles in agencies have always been the norm, and generally overlooked by those in the know. Anyone who can go from "intern" to "account executive" overnight isn't an executive, but it sure looks good on a proposal or business card (and makes clients feel... for a moment... as if the trembling person across the table may just a bit less green).
So the saying goes, you can't be a vice president at a major firm without at least five years experience (yes, a whopping five years... maybe four if you show promise!).
But lately, it seems, titles are growing more and more disproportionate to actual expertise. What is a general manager when there are multiple GMs in an office? Does a senior vice president trump an executive vice president? How about the managing director title for the Brit you lured in -- equivalent to a GM, or below the junior partner?
I'm now waiting for what's to come... workgroup president, associate chief listener, senior equity partner, and I-Only-Show-At-Pitches-So-Don't-Expect-To-See-Me-Again-Owner/Player/Manager.
Title inflation is a fact of agency life. But, if you're bestowed with one of these monikers, or are responsible for handing them out like candy to needy employees at every turn, ask yourself now and again if you may not be drawing snickers (or worse, creating false confidence) beyond your agency's walls.






